[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: New Key Repo Locations



On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 10:29 +0300, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 12:06:00AM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 23:53 -0400, Warren Togami wrote:
> > > Anyhow, updates should begin flowing soon, and shortly thereafter
> > > the old key is removed.  Oh, did you actually test rpm -e during
> > > %post?  According to skvidal it doesn't work because it locks the
> > > transaction.  Jeremy thinks the only assured way we can remove the
> > > old key is with a hardcoded hack in rpm that will be removed in
> > > F10 rpm.
> > 
> > I tested rpm -e during %post on two f9 systems, It locked the rpmdb
> > hard.
> 
> Have you tried with gpg-pubkey entries? I had asked on rpm-devel back
> in these days when I was using the following snippet:
> 
> %post
> if [ "$1" = 1 ]; then
>   for key in \
>     gpg-pubkey-db42a60e-37ea5438,RPM-GPG-KEY.redhat \
>     gpg-pubkey-66534c2b-3e60b428,RPM-GPG-KEY.atrpms \
>     gpg-pubkey-e42d547b-3960bdf1,RPM-GPG-KEY.freshrpms \
>     gpg-pubkey-b8693f2c-3f48c249,RPM-GPG-KEY.newrpms \
>     gpg-pubkey-6b8d79e6-3f49313d,RPM-GPG-KEY.dag \
>     gpg-pubkey-bbf04688-4018dbeb,RPM-GPG-KEY.biorpms \
>     gpg-pubkey-68d9802a-406db022,RPM-GPG-KEY.ccrma \
>     gpg-pubkey-4f2a6fd2-3f9d9d3b,RPM-GPG-KEY.redhat-fedora \
>   ; do
>     :
>     rpm -e --allmatches `echo $key | awk -F, '{print $1}'` > /dev/null 2>&1 || :
>     rpm --import /usr/share/atrpms/`echo $key | awk -F, '{print $2}'`
>   done
> fi
> 
> I'm not using this anymore, since I can't vouch for the trust to all
> third party repos, but the code was running fine back then w/o locking
> up rpmdb. Maybe an rpm regression? Or maybe it works for gpg-pubkeys
> only? Should we loop in Panu?

yes, I tried gpg-pubkey specifically, both with and without the full
extension.

-sv



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]