Request to remove infofeed

[seth vidal]

On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 12:31 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, seth vidal wrote:
> 
> >
> > On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 11:09 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Luke Macken wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It looks like the infofeed has the RPM summary, description, and recent
> > > > changelog.  Bodhi doesn't know about any of these things, so it will
> > > > require some database changes to store it.  I've been meaning to have
> > > > bodhi grab the recent RPM changelog upon submission for a little while now,
> > > > so I don't have a problem implementing this, if we care?
> > > >
> > > > If we were to display these fields too, it would end up looking like
> > > >
> > > >     name - summary
> > > >     package description
> > > >
> > > >     update notes
> > > >     bug list
> > > >
> > > >     rpm changelog
> > > >
> > > > Is this what we want?
> > >
> > > Instead of storing this information in the bodhi db is there somewhere
> > > else we can get it from?  Koji or pkgdb for example.
> >
> > we have it in the repodata. Which is where the infofeed gets it from :)
> 
> Thats kind of my point actually I know koji stores a lot of this
> information in it's database even though the rpms themselves have the
> information.  I'd hate to continue to duplicate information that we're
> already storing all over the place unless there's a real need for it.
> 

well, to be fair the duplication in the infofeeds are pretty minimal.

-sv