FAS instance on publictest10?

[Ricky Zhou]

On 2008-07-08 08:48:57 PM, Luke Macken wrote:
> Hmmm, so what is the difference between the pt10 and pt9 deployments?
> We've been testing the bleeding-edge python-fedora package on pt10, so
> if that is causing the issues we definitely need to track it down asap.
I manually updated python-fedora on pt9 to test that as well - so far,
so good, although I still never figured out what was causing the
NoSuchTable errors on publictest10.  

Thanks,
Ricky
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/attachments/20080708/72991495/attachment.sig>