[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Metalink support

Bram Neijt wrote:
So would I, but for what I've seen the SHA1 information is not part of
the mirrormanager database.

For any "good" implementation of metalinks in the mirrormanager, I
would at least want trustworthy SHA1 information in the database
otherwise the only advantage of using metalinks would be load
balancing on your mirrors (which is already mostly fixed with MM).

So for the end user, there is not much to gain if metalinks is
implemented in the mirrormanager. The only solution for the SHA1
information I could think of was to implement a script on the main
mirror which hosts the SHA1 files, which would mean not running on the
server with the MM database, which would mean not having direct access
to that database.

Parsing HTML is pretty stupid, I agree, but there is probably a much
cleaner way of getting the mirror list (I havn't worked with turbo
gears before, so I couldn't find a view of the list I would want).
Something like fedora-test-data/mirror-hosts-core.txt would be much

Rene is still working on the MM patch, but without the SHA1
information, I'm not really sure it would be _my_ ideal solution.


How about using:


instead of the HTML?

Incorporating that in the .metalink, trusting Mirrormanager with managing whether that file is actually the file that is supposed to be there, and the metalink client doing a check-up on the chunks it has downloads and see if they match? Creating a metalink would then consist of:

- getting the iso
- verifying the sha1sum (so you don't start off on the wrong foot)
- creating chunks and their sha1sum for use in a .metalink file
- while/before the .metalink is being downloaded by a client, incorporate the mirrormanager results and trust mirrormanager to return the 1) right mirrors, 2) the right files, 3) the files with correct content. - optionally allow the .metalink to be created on-the-fly with all parameters mirrormanager has (&country=NL,DE,BE, but not &redirect=1)

Does that sound like a good idea?

Just my brain dump ;p

Kind regards,

Jeroen van Meeuwen

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]