[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Fedora 10 Beta Release Planning Meeting

Josh Boyer wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 12:15:46AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I have. My point still stands. If a new Fedora meeting is being held, it should not planned and organized as a secret. It should be announced

So those Red Hat budget meetings that control the financial fate of Fedora...

those should be planned in public too right?

No but the meeting minutes are not published publicly for such meetings either. The Fedora specific budget details are however published at


This I consider to be a very good thing.

  Or the meetings that were held
to discuss the outage crisis?

Here there might have been reasons for secrecy and it would better to let people know that such a meeting is being held even then. I don't see any such requirement for release planning.

Should Paul publish his work calendar, given
that he's the Fedora project lead and has Fedora meetings all the time?

Since all the other public Fedora meetings are well known, I don't need his work calender.

Seriously, everything is not black and white.  You're making entirely too
big of a deal about this because you didn't get invited and someone pissed
in your lemondade

Whether I get invited or not is irrelevant and I don't drink lemondate much ;-) I never said I should be invited even once. There is no need to be so petty. You might want to read about what I said completely. My issue is with the way in this meeting is organized and planned in secret and just that.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]