[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: func logrotate fix



On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Jon Stanley <jonstanley gmail com> wrote:
> I'll throw a -1 in here (not that my vote matters for anything :) ).
> Not because of any risk in the change, but rather it violates the
> concept of a change freeze. It doesn't affect service, so if I went to
> our change management meeting at work with something like this during
> a change freeze I'd be laughed out of the room and told to wait.
>
> In my mind, we either have change freezes and stick to them, or we
> just forgo the charade.

I thought the point of a change freeze is so that we are more cautious
about changes we have to make.  Since everyone seems to approve the
idea of making such a change during the change freeze, it seems
acceptable to do so.

-Yaakov
>
> On 9/28/08, Xavier Lamien <laxathom fedoraproject org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath redhat com> wrote:
>>> I'd like to implement the following global fix (its generating cron spam)
>>>
>>> in /etc/logrotate.d/func_rotate I'd like to change line 8 from
>>>
>>> /etc/init.d/funcd condrestart
>>>
>>> to
>>>
>>> /etc/init.d/funcd condrestart > /dev/null
>>>
>>> Can I get 2 +1's?
>>
>> +1


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]