[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: New SOP page




On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:

> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > I've categorized all of our SOP (Standard Operating Procedure) pages in
> > the [[Category:Infrastructure SOPs]] and made a new page for them:
> >   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Infrastructure_SOPs
> >
> > (The old URL redirects there so old, external links are still fine).
> > The index on the page is generated automatically by the category.  This
> > means that anytime you create a new SOP simply place this Category tag
> > at the bottom of the page and it will appear here as well::
> >
> > [[Category:Infrastructure SOPs]]
> >
> > As you can see from the index on the page, the MoinMoin, hierarchical
> > directory index scheme makes the Category Index a little ugly
> > (everything is listed as beginning with "I" because they all start with
> > "Infrastructure".  Additionally, the docs folks recommend that everyone
> > renames pages to be more natural language oriented so that mediawiki's
> > search functionality works better.
> >
> > If I rename in Mediawiki, there will be redirects from the old names to
> > the new ones.  Does anyone mind if I start doing that?
> >
> > I was thinking of one of the following schemes:
> >
> > A) Infrastructure/SOP/Baculs => Bacula
> > B) Infrastructure/SOP/Bacula => Bacula SOP
> >
> Talked to ianweller on IRC and he recommends:
>
> /wiki/Bacula Infrastructure SOP
>
> and since that's a long URL... having a shortcut (basically a redirect)
> page name: SOP:BACULA
> #REDIRECT [[Bacula Infrastructure SOP]]
>
> So http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SOP:BACULA would take you to the proper
> place.
>

My only concern here is we're not the only group with SOP's, releng also
uses them.  Although as long as we don't conflict it might not be a
terrible idea to merge them.

	-Mike


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]