memcached opinions

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Mike McGrath<mmcgrath at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Mike McGrath<mmcgrath at redhat.com> wrote:
>> > I'm not sure if we have any memcached experience on the list but I thought
>> > I'd ask.  Can anyone explain this:
>> >
>> > http://pastebin.ca/1481219
>> >
>> > Notice how memcached1 has a much higher hit rate and memcached2 has a much
>> > lower hit rate?
>> >
>>
>> The time for memcached1 is 5x less than memcached2 being up. That can
>> have an effect on caching as right after a system comes up its rates
>> are usually much higher and then over time fall off (iirc). I think it
>> would take bringing both up at the same time to figure out if there is
>> a true disparity over caching.
>>
>
> I thought that exact same thing :)
>
> memcahed1:
> STAT uptime 9143
> STAT get_hits 311736
> STAT get_misses 11255
>
> memcached2:
> STAT uptime 9144
> STAT get_hits 49679
> STAT get_misses 11116
>

Now that shows something not kosher. My guess is some app is not
talking to both? What apps use memcached for what?


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"