Licensing Guidelines for apps we write

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On 07/02/2009 07:03 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/02/2009 08:53 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> Hi, I've had a chance to talk to spot and I've drafted the following
>> policy about licensing the things that we write in Fedora Infrastructure:
>>
>>   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Licensing
>>
>> Do people like it?  Is a GPL family license pretty much everywhere good
>> for everyone or are there places that we'd like the general rule to be
>> "MIT" or something looser instead?
> 
> Has Red Hat Legal been consulted on this?
> 
I've consulted spot.  Spot based his input on the policy on feedback he
received while relicensing Fedora Community to AGPLv3+.

-Toshio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/attachments/20090702/23b91c98/attachment.sig>