Relicensing Part II (redux)

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On 07/23/2009 11:48 AM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 01:46:45PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:09:04AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>>> Resending since spot didn't get it the first time.
>>>
>>> Okay, at the infrastructure meeting this week we had a long discussion
>>> about using AGPL in infrastructure and we decided we need more
>>> information about what the AGPL requires of us.  Here's a run down and
>>> then the questions we had.
>>
>> I invited Bradley Kuhn of the Software Freedom Conservancy to join
>> today's IRC meeting.  Not sure if he can join, but he's well versed in
>> the AGPLv3 and I had pointed him at this thread.  He offered to join
>> and discuss with us.
> 
> He's at OSCON this week, so I invited him to attend future Thursday
> meeting.
> 
Excellent.  Depending on when spot hears back from Red Hat legal and
whether we have more questions after that, we may just be a case study
for him or we may still be in the midst of figuring out what we want to do.

-Toshio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/attachments/20090723/a99a7d32/attachment.sig>