A discussion on licensing and the AGPLv3

[Tom "spot" Callaway]

On 07/28/2009 12:11 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> I take these two to answers to mean roughly:
> 
> Configuration is not copyrightable.  Therefore changes to configuration
> files and configuration within scripts is not something that needs to be
> provided under the AGPLv3.  If we are still concerned about them, Red
> Hat Legal will help us write a license for the config files that makes
> clear that changes to them do not have to be distributed.

Yes, that's precisely how I interpreted this as well.

I did miss the other questions, and have just now sent them over to RH
Legal.

~spot