yslow website stats

[Darren VanBuren]

cache-control is certainly advantageous over older methods, as it
certainly does provide finer grain control.

Darren L. VanBuren
=====================
http://theoks.net/



On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 19:54, Brennan Ashton <bashton at brennanashton.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Darren VanBuren <onekopaka at gmail.com> wrote:
>> However, browsers cache on EXACT URLs. So if you attach ?2010011023 to
>> a URL, it will only be valid until the URL changes or the expiry time
>> comes around.
>>
>> Darren L. VanBuren
>> =====================
>> http://theoks.net/
>>
>
> However if my browser caches http://fedoraproject.org and there is a
> static file pointed at called image1.gif, even if you update
> fedoraproject.org to point to the static file image1-2.gif instead,
> that update will not be seen until fedoraproject.org expires from my
> cache and I will still be seeing image1.gif.
>
> I really think that cache-control is the way to go at least for
> content that we want to cache, but also want to have control of all
> the time.
>
> --Brennan Ashton
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
> Fedora-infrastructure-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
>