spec hacks for vanilla and git-based kernel rpm builds

[Jarod Wilson]

Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 07:27:17PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> 
>  > > Shipping it with 'rc3' or whatever in the title seems a little more
>  > > honest at least about what we're shipping, and at the same time,
>  > > it prevents bad reviewers from writing "Fedora still ships with a 2.6.22
>  > > kernel".
>  > 
>  > A proper kernel naming would help there as well (e.g. name the kernels
>  > just as upstream -- e.g. 2.6.23-rc[1-7]{,.git[0-9]*). ;-) Yeah, this old
>  > topic again that never got solved.
> 
> Indeed. That's what Jarod was proposing to fix no?

Well, initially, I was thinking only for the vanilla variant to start
out, but screw it, I'll go whole hog. Working on it now...

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jwilson at redhat.com


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 251 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-kernel-list/attachments/20070702/84fb528f/attachment.sig>