cpuspeed und cpuidle

[Dave Jones]

On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 12:55:49PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
 > On 07/11/2007 12:48 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
 > > I submitted a push request for the FC6 update I did w/the other pre-F7
 > > update system, but haven't got any notice about it being pushed just
 > > yet. I'll ping someone in rel-eng.
 > > 
 > > Can't wait for FC-6 to die now, so we don't have two different ways of
 > > doing things (er, make that three w/the RHEL stuff I do too)...
 > > 
 > 
 > Not until December...
 > 
 > I wonder if we shouldn't just be very conservative with FC6 and drop
 > the cpuidle there patch as well. Then that update wouldn't be needed.
 > Otherwise we've got to add another 'requires' to the kernel package.

Oh good point, cpuidle is part of that massive -hrt update, so when
we drop 64bit tickless it goes away anyway..

 > (And I assume the cpuspeed update still works with old 2.6.18 kernels
 > in case someone updates cpuspeed but not the kernel?)

it would, it's just tightening a check for files in sysfs to not
pick up the new cpuidle dir, just the cpuN dirs.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk