kernel-xen f9 spec update

[Mark McLoughlin]

On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 12:26 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 April 2008 10:09:17 am Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 09:52 +0200, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sat, 2008-03-29 at 15:19 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > > 
> > > > We recently tweaked the main kernel package's spec file such that we now 
> > > > include arch in uname -r output, and have standardized a bunch of path names 
> > > > to match. Completely forgot about kernel-xen in the process, until yesterday, 
> > > > when I started porting everything over the the kernel-xen-2.6/devel spec.
> > > > 
> > > > The attached spec patch has been build-tested, with some manual inspection of 
> > > > the resulting packages, but hasn't yet been run-time tested for possible 
> > > > issues (none expected, but you never know...). I'll happily help out with any 
> > > > possible issues if you guys could give this a spin.
> > > > 
> > > > Definitely want this in ASAP so the kernel and kernel-xen bits stay mostly in 
> > > > sync (speaking of which, there's also some rpmposttrans stuff -- dkms 
> > > > hooks -- which went into the main kernel spec a bit ago that I don't see in 
> > > > the kernel-xen-2.6 spec
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the heads-up and the patch. I'm planning on rebasing
> > > kernel-xen-2.6/devel to the latest kernel/devel sometime this week, so
> > > we'll pick up all this stuff.
> > 
> > Okay, kernel-xen in rawhide is rebased to 2.6.25-0.182.rc7.git6 if you
> > want to take a look.
> 
> Apologies if this is a dupe, X is being a tad crashy on me today...
> Looks much better, but a few places where %{KVERREL}xen should be
> changed to %{KVERREL}.xen to be consistent with the other flavoured
> kernels.

Thanks, applied.

Cheers,
Mark.