(no subject)

[Kyle McMartin]

On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 06:53:55AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Subject: Re: de-modularising for the win!
> Message-ID: <20080920105355.GA6663 at nostromo.devel.redhat.com>
> References: <20080918191355.GA9683 at nostromo.devel.redhat.com> <48D2D94E.2020902 at redhat.com> <20080918231301.GA4734 at nostromo.devel.redhat.com> <1221790735.15361.152.camel at aglarond.local>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> In-Reply-To: <1221790735.15361.152.camel at aglarond.local>
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
> 
> Jeremy Katz (katzj at redhat.com) said: 
> > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 16:13 -0700, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > - killing the initrd for that general 90% case can be a big win
> > 
> > Ermm, the general 90% (or some large-ish generalizing percentage) are
> > set up to use LVM.  Which then requires an initrd.
> 
> Yes, but ... LVM is overkill, in general. (That's another discussion.)
> 
> On further consideration, though, the biggest issue with kicking out
> the initrd is getting the policy lodaed.
> 

But, won't we all be using btrfs instead of lvm in F11? ;-)