RPM upgrade discussion
seth vidal
skvidal at phy.duke.edu
Tue Dec 30 13:51:39 UTC 2003
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 05:00, Warren Togami wrote:
> Chuck Wolber wrote:
> >
> >>2) Should we upgrade to rpm-4.2.x for RH7.x? While the benefit for
> >>apt-get would be minimal, the benefit for yum would be immense as that
> >>would enable the use of yum-2.x. Another key benefit would be
> >>compatibility with the newer RPM GPG signatures.
> >
> >
> > RPM 4.0.4 is just so damn stable, it'd be hard to risk an upgrade. Also, I
> > must express a bit of ignorance here when it comes to yum, as I didn't
> > realize that *adding* yum would require an RPM upgrade.
>
> The only issue is yum-1.x is the only version that works with rpm-4.0.4.
What is wrong with yum-1.x?
-sv
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list