[Fedora-legacy-list] Re: Delay? Looks bad for Fedora

[Jeremy Portzer]

On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 10:37, seth vidal wrote:
> > Yes.  But since the Fedora and Fedora Legacy software does not yet exist,
> > it only inspires hope, and doesn't provide a solution yet.  And sending
> > it to fedora list is not the best idea.  If I'm on the fedora list, I
> > probably know about it already.  Send it to the Red Hat lists, not the
> > fedora lists.  Send it to the RH related lists, to reach those not on
> > the Red Hat lists.  And put info on the Red Hat web site pointing to
> > the Fedora and Fedora Legacy web sites.
> > 
> > We're RH customers.   We go to www.redhat.com for info.  The info/links
> > need to be there.  Many of us are on Red Hat's public mailing list.  They
> > should be providing this information, or at least pointers to it.
> 
> Red hat doesn't have any interest to do that afaict. They want to sell
> RHEL - why drive people to something else?

But Red Hat did announce and conceive of Fedora Legacy.
But I guess you're saying they didn't conceive of the extended support
for 7.3 and 9, as they figure that 7.3 and 9 server users should migrate
to RHEL?

--Jeremy

-- 
/---------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Jeremy Portzer        jeremyp at pobox.com      trilug.org/~jeremy     |
| GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F  E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 |
\---------------------------------------------------------------------/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20031105/8f65bd3c/attachment.sig>