queries regarding fedora core 3
Erik Hemdal
ehemdal at townisp.com
Thu Dec 2 04:08:46 UTC 2004
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 15:46:54 +0530 (IST)
> From: "Shibu Clement Phd aero" <shibu at iitk.ac.in>
> Subject: queries regarding fedora core 3
> To: fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID:
> <32846.172.28.32.210.1101377814.squirrel at nwebmail.iitk.ac.in>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>
> I have few days back I have installed fedora core 3 on mu
> computer. It is
> having dual operating system. The other operating system is
> WindowsXP. Now
> I am not able to boot windowsXP. Can you give me a proper solution for
> this. I am a very bad shape. Waiting for your postive and
> prompt reply. My
> system is Pentium4, 3.2 Ghz with HT. The mother board is
> intel D865GVHZ.
> regards,
> Shibu
>
This is not the right place for your question. Sign up for fedora-list,
rather than fedora-legacy-list.
This one does not deal in FC3 questions (yet).
When you post, please give a little more information about how you performed
the installation. For example, what choices did you make about
Type of installation (workstation/server/etc.)
How is the disk partitioned?
If you changed partitions, how did you do it?
Did anything happen that you did not expect? (errors, strange messages,
lockups, etc.)
Where you sign up for the list, you can find the archives. There you may
find that someone has already reported your problem and found the solution.
If you cannot find an answer, the fact that you looked will make others more
willing to help you.
Good luck. Erik
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 19:09:38 +0100
> From: Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org>
> Subject: Re: queries regarding fedora core 3
> To: shibu at iitk.ac.in, Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project
> <fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <1101838177.22761.420.camel at serendipity.dogma.lan>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Am Do, den 25.11.2004 schrieb Shibu Clement Phd aero um 11:16:
>
> > I have few days back I have installed fedora core 3 on mu
> computer. It is
> > having dual operating system. The other operating system is
> WindowsXP. Now
>
> > Shibu
>
> You are mailing on the wrong list.
>
> Alexander
>
>
> --
> Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | new address - new key: 0xB366A773
> legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
> Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on Athlon kernel 2.6.9-1.6_FC2smp
> Serendipity 19:09:30 up 10 days, 13:57, load average: 0.46,
> 0.67, 0.70
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
> Url :
> /archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20041130/d621f6b1/att
achment.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:05:31 -0800 (PST)
> From: Dan Hollis <spamtrap433941935136 at anime.net>
> Subject: Re: Round-up, 2004-11-28
> To: Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project
> <fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0411301404310.6477-100000 at sasami.anime.net>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Eric Rostetter wrote:
> > Quoting Jim Popovitch <jimpop at yahoo.com>:
> > > --- Jesse eating <jkeating at j2solutions.net> wrote:
> > > > Other than the account, what is too complex?
> > > IMO, The bug system itself.
> > Do you mean Bugzilla, or something else?
>
> bugzilla is rather top heavy, cumbersome and non intuitive.
> i've used a
> number of different bug tracking systems and i'd rank it near
> the bottom.
>
> -Dan
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 22:07:45 -0500
> From: Marc Deslauriers <marcdeslauriers at videotron.ca>
> Subject: Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification: gnome-vfs
> To: "fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com" <fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <1101870465.15816.2.camel at mdlinux>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Fedora Test Update Notification
> FEDORA-2004-1944
> Bugzilla https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1944
> 2004-11-30
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Name : gnome-vfs
> Version 7.3 : 1.0.5-4.1.legacy
> Version 9 : 1.0.5-13.1.legacy and 2.2.2-4.1.legacy
> Summary : The GNOME virtual file-system libraries.
> Description :
> GNOME VFS is the GNOME virtual file system. It is the foundation of
> the Nautilus file manager. It provides a modular architecture and
> ships with several modules that implement support for file systems,
> http, ftp, and others. It provides a URI-based API, backend
> supporting asynchronous file operations, a MIME type manipulation
> library, and other features.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Update Information:
>
> Updated GNOME VFS packages that remove potential extfs-related
> vulnerabilities are now available.
>
> GNOME VFS is the GNOME virtual file system. It provides a modular
> architecture and ships with several modules that implement support for
> file systems, HTTP, FTP, and others. The extfs backends make
> it possible
> to implement file systems for GNOME VFS using scripts.
>
> Flaws have been found in several of the GNOME VFS extfs
> backend scripts.
> Red Hat Linux ships with vulnerable scripts, but they are not used by
> default. An attacker who is able to influence a user to open a
> specially-crafted URI using gnome-vfs could perform actions as that
> user. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project (cve.mitre.org)
> has assigned the name CAN-2004-0494 to this issue.
>
> Users of Red Hat Linux should upgrade to these updated packages, which
> remove these unused scripts.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Changelog:
>
> 7.3:
> * Tue Nov 30 2004 Marc Deslauriers <marcdeslauriers at videotron.ca>
> 1.0.5-4.1.legacy
> - Added automake autoconf253 intltool libtool db1-devel openssl-devel
> gtk-doc and gettext BuildRequires
>
> * Mon Aug 30 2004 Dave Botsch <dwb7 at ccmr.cornell.edu>
> - added legacy to version
> - Drop extfs from package due to security: CAN-2004-0494
>
> 9 gnome-vfs:
> * Mon Nov 29 2004 Marc Deslauriers <marcdeslauriers at videotron.ca>
> 1.0.5-13.1.legacy
> - Added automake14, gettext, intltool, libtool, openssl-devel
> and gtk-doc BuildRequires
>
> * Fri Aug 13 2004 Jon Peatfield <J.S.Peatfield at damtp.cam.ac.uk>
> - Drop unused extfs from the package due to security issues using
> patch from Michal Jaegermann <michal at harddata.com>
>
> 9 gnome-vfs2:
> * Mon Nov 29 2004 Marc Deslauriers <marcdeslauriers at videotron.ca>
> 2.2.2-4.1.legacy
> - Added automake14, libtool, gettext, scrollkeeper, docbook-utils,
> fam-devel, openssl-devel and docbook-style-xsl BuildRequires
>
> * Fri Aug 13 2004 Jon Peatfield <J.S.Peatfield at damtp.cam.ac.uk>
> - remove extfs based on change in RHEL 3AS
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This update can be downloaded from:
> http://download.fedoralegacy.org/redhat/
>
> 1b2e233aa6ae55ae23a6789fb13c5b6448a2a949
> 7.3/updates-testing/i386/gnome-vfs-1.0.5-4.1.legacy.i386.rpm
> 7a651d8d5ddfc1838664551c97f0326a385f80d1
> 7.3/updates-testing/i386/gnome-vfs-devel-1.0.5-4.1.legacy.i386.rpm
> 95d81f3f9744e57c41b80057fd9c1d210cb3f772
> 7.3/updates-testing/SRPMS/gnome-vfs-1.0.5-4.1.legacy.src.rpm
> 0c4d06767ec7ffefbcdb77b66f8845502204d5da
> 9/updates-testing/i386/gnome-vfs-1.0.5-13.1.legacy.i386.rpm
> 8f5c82ba289b2e7b51079af4867ddddaf66006d4
> 9/updates-testing/i386/gnome-vfs2-2.2.2-4.1.legacy.i386.rpm
> 65650947bcc05f583b0833ad429e8204e7533fa2
> 9/updates-testing/i386/gnome-vfs2-devel-2.2.2-4.1.legacy.i386.rpm
> e702fbcd55b20e6208fe460eb83035173e25a1c4
> 9/updates-testing/i386/gnome-vfs-devel-1.0.5-13.1.legacy.i386.rpm
> 5a6db00010fefa6117f5b417262279c7d2645a6a
> 9/updates-testing/SRPMS/gnome-vfs-1.0.5-13.1.legacy.src.rpm
> b48bb8e86f9300f2a0b6da398bf3004cba2c19c3
> 9/updates-testing/SRPMS/gnome-vfs2-2.2.2-4.1.legacy.src.rpm
>
> Please note that this update is also available via yum and apt through
> the updates-testing channel. Many people find this an easier
> way to apply updates.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Please test these new packages and add comments to Bugzilla.
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
> Url :
> /archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20041130/78459fb0/att
achment.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 20:21:57 -0800
> From: Eric Wagar <eric at deadhookers.org>
> Subject: chkconfig or start|stop for postfix
> To: fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <200411302021.58020.eric at deadhookers.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Is there a chkconfig flag for postfix? If so, what is it?
>
> I don't seem to see it. (Or I am just too old to be doing
> this anymore.)
>
> Thanks
> eric
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 07:39:45 -0500
> From: "Paul W. Frields" <paul at frields.com>
> Subject: Re: chkconfig or start|stop for postfix
> To: Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project
> <fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <1101904785.6459.5.camel at berlin.east.gov>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 20:21 -0800, Eric Wagar wrote:
> > Is there a chkconfig flag for postfix? If so, what is it?
> >
> > I don't seem to see it. (Or I am just too old to be doing
> this anymore.)
> >
> > Thanks
> > eric
>
> Have you already done:
>
> alternatives --config mta
>
> ...to select postfix as your MTA? Once you do that, your initscripts
> will be set up so that chkconfig has postfix flagged instead of
> Sendmail.
>
> --
> Paul W. Frields, RHCE
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 05:59:27 -0800
> From: Eric Wagar <eric at deadhookers.org>
> Subject: Re: chkconfig or start|stop for postfix
> To: Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project
> <fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <200412010559.27421.eric at deadhookers.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> > > Is there a chkconfig flag for postfix? If so, what is it?
> > >
> > > I don't seem to see it. (Or I am just too old to be
> doing this anymore.)
> >
> > Have you already done:
> >
> > alternatives --config mta
> >
> > ...to select postfix as your MTA? Once you do that, your initscripts
> > will be set up so that chkconfig has postfix flagged instead of
> > Sendmail.
>
> I just did. I now see a postfix chkconfig, and no sendmail chkconfig.
>
> Great, thanks for the info!
>
> eric
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 14:34:26 +0000
> From: Brian Morrison <bdm at fenrir.org.uk>
> Subject: Re: chkconfig or start|stop for postfix
> To: Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project
> <fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <20041201143426.1ea5a38f at ickx.fenrir.org.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 07:39:45 -0500 in
> 1101904785.6459.5.camel at berlin.east.gov "Paul W. Frields"
> <paul at frields.com> wrote:
>
> > alternatives --config mta
>
> Ah, deep magic.......
>
> --
>
> Brian Morrison
>
> bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
>
> GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 16:57:24 +0000
> From: Oisin Curtin <Oisin.Curtin at PhoenixFltOps.com>
> Subject: Thanks to AH for update: man-1.5o1-6
> To: fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <41ADF7F4.7080209 at PhoenixFltOps.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>
> Thank you, Adrian Havill, for fixing man.
>
> Those fixed-width man pages really, really bugged me. I was ready to
> throw in my hand, but this update really revs my engine!
>
>
> --
> Oisin "man 1 fold" Curtin
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> fedora-legacy-list mailing list
> fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
>
> End of fedora-legacy-list Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1
> *************************************************
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list