Separating the roles of the QA process

[Marc Deslauriers]

On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 08:43 +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
> Fine by me.  IMHO, however, it is very useful to run 
> rpm-build-compare.sh on the _binary_ RPMS, to see if there have been 
> any changes (e.g., some library or file went missing by accident, 
> etc.).  These kind of changes are impossible to test on your own.
> 

We had a lot of build problems in mach with missing BuildRequires in Red
Hat's packages so we have to use rpm-build-compare.sh on the resulting
binary packages that are produced in order to find out if anything is
missing. This gets done before packages are put in updates-testing to
make sure mach didn't break anything.

Marc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20041217/4ab13f1b/attachment.sig>