Update Announcement Format discussion
Jesse Keating
jkeating at j2solutions.net
Sun Jan 11 17:18:14 UTC 2004
On Saturday 10 January 2004 21:56, Pekka Savola wrote:
> I wouldn't used bugzilla-id in the header; they aren't sequential,
> and the users will get confused ("did I miss 15 security
> advisories?!?!").
Hrm point taken. I suppose we'll have to come up w/ a good numbering
scheme and a way to ensure no cross numbers.
> I'd suggest just allocating a number on FCFS basis
>
> > Product: Red Hat Linux
>
> Not sure if there may be a trademark issue here.. Perhaps one should
> add a preamble "0. About Fedora Legacy", plus 1-2 sentences to
> describe the relation to Red Hat Linux.
Just because "Red Hat Linux" is trademarked, doesn't mean we can't
mention it in a document. The update would in fact be for Red Hat
Linux. We can have somewhere at the bottom of the thing that Red Hat
Linux is a trademark of blah....
--
Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org)
Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org)
GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Was I helpful? Let others know:
http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list