Proposal: Optional libsafe add-on?

[seth vidal]

> > 
> > 
> > Modifying the world as an 'option' for legacy updates seems like a bad
> > idea, a confusing idea for users, and generally a waste of time. If I've
> > got older machines I want them to be left alone and just have security
> > patches applied. I don't want to be putting brand new things on there.
> > 
> > -sv
> > 
> 
> This is why I suggested putting it on the webpage with lots of 
> documentation and manual installation only.  The documentation would to 
> people NOT to use it unless they really know what they are doing and 
> willing to monitor their server for a while.
> 

Why waste all the time building the packages and writing up the
documentation?

People should be working on new things for FC2 and not screwing around
with old distributions.

-sv