yum and rpm updates for 8.0

[Jesse Keating]

On Thursday 29 January 2004 08:49, Jason Lim wrote:
> If that is the case (that yum 1.x works around whatever bug is in
> rpm) then isn't rolling yum 1.x the logical path, rather than issuing
> non-essential upgrades for rpm? I suppose some people will want to
> upgrade rpm anyway, and they should have the choice, but this choice
> should not be mandatory imho.

The choice never was going to be mandatory.  It was an optional upgrade 
from the very beginning.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
Mondo DevTeam           (www.mondorescue.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
 
Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20040129/c98a791f/attachment.sig>