libpng for 7.x
Dave Jones
davej at redhat.com
Sat May 1 16:41:52 UTC 2004
On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 11:31:41AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
>
> > Ouch. That seem like a recipe for disaster. What if RH would, out of the
> > blue, decide to actually release an official update to something we thought
> > was completely out of maintenance? Not likely to happen with 7.x, but maybe
> > one or two RHL9 updates will still trickle out. I think Seth's choice of not
> > touching the base RH package's version number is a better policy choice --
> > largely _because_ there is no upstream constant method. Instead, we should
> > leave whatever they do alone, and add after that.
>
> Red hat knows that fedora legacy exists. If they pull anything like that
> for a 7.x release then I will feel very very justified in smacking the
> packager in question.
For RHL9 kernel updates at least, I'm happy to work with Fedora-legacy
folks to get updates out rather than ever having to do another RHL9 update
on behalf of Red Hat. I imagine other Red Hat package owners will feel
the seem way.
Dave
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list