Round-up, 2004-09-20

Stephen E. Dudek mule at umich.edu
Mon Sep 20 18:11:46 UTC 2004 

Dominic,

In reviewing this list, I believe the following should also be added to
your round-up list:

cvs - http://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1735
It is currently listed as RESOLVED but seems to be in limbo under
updates-testing.

On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 20:09, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> $Id: issues.txt,v 1.47 2004/09/20 00:01:49 dom Exp $
> 
> See bottom for changes
> 
> This list is also available at
> http://www-astro.physics.ox.ac.uk/~dom/legacy/issues.txt
> 
> Packages that have been verified and should be fully released
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> tcpdump - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1468
> cadaver - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1552
> flim - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1581
> rsync - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1569 (but superceded)
> xchat - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1549
> squirrelmail - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1733
> 
> Packages waiting to be built for updates-testing
> ------------------------------------------------
> 
> gaim - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1237
> lha - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1833
> ethereal - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1840
> XFree86 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1289
> mod_proxy - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1737
> rsync - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2003
> mod_ssl - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1888
> XFree86 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1831
> gdk-pixbuf - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1371 (rh73,superceded)
> glibc - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1947
> kernel - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1804
> abiword - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1906
> 
> Packages in state RESOLVED (ie exist in updates-testing) that need
> active work.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> mailman - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1269
> There were some unconfirmed reports of breakage with the candidate. This
> needs more QA before release.
> 
> mod_python - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1325
> Needs 1 VERIFY before release.
> 
> ethereal - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1419
> Needs 2 VERIFY before release. - but dup with 1840?
> 
> kernel - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1484
> Needs missing file rebuilt for verification - but preferentially put
> work into later kernel ticket
> 
> mozilla - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1532
> Needs 2 VERIFY but has been superceded
> 
> lha - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1547
> Needs 2 VERIFY but has been superceded
> 
> squid - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1732
> Needs 1 VERIFY before release (but about to be superceded?)
> 
> Packages in state UNCONFIRMED, NEW, ASSIGNED or REOPENED:
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 
> * readline - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2017
> Another not fixed before EOL (rh9). WONTFIX?
> 
> netpbm - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1257
> Needs PUBLISH, especially for rh9
> 
> kdelibs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1373
> Needs 2 PUBLISH (superceded)
> 
> yum - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1604
> Needs 2 PUBLISH
> 
> mod_ssl - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1708
> Needs PUBLISH for rh9 (but superceded)
> 
> krb5 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1726
> Obsoleted
> 
> libxml - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1324
> Sort out confusion over status over version in updates-testing and add
> RESOLVED flag.
> 
> sysstat - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1372
> Need 2 PUBLISH - 7.3 only I think
> 
> mc - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1548
> Need 1 PUBLISH (but superceded?)
> 
> libpng - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1550
> Superceded
> 
> libpng - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1943
> Need 1 PUBLISH for rh9
> 
> tripwire - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1719
> Resolve problems with how to version and build fix
> 
> apache - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1805
> Is this redundant?
> 
> mysql - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1832
> Needs 1 PUBLISH but superceded?
> 
> mozilla - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1834
> Needs 1 PUBLISH for rh9 + rebuilt galeon SRPM with fixed build-deps
> 
> php - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1868
> Needs PUBLISH, especially for rh7.3
> 
> samba - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1924
> Needs PUBLISH, especially for rh9
> 
> gnome vfs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1944
> Needs 2 PUBLISH
> 
> sox - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1945
> Needs PUBLISH for rh9 and possible renaming of rh7.3 package
> 
> qt - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2002
> Needs 2 PUBLISH
> 
> gdk-pixbuf - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2005
> Needs 2 PUBLISH
> 
> mysql - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2006
> Needs 2 PUBLISH
> 
> ruby - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2007
> needs work
> 
> kdelibs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2008
> Needs 2 PUBLISH
> 
> mc - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2009
> Needs work
> 
> pam_wheel - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2010
> Needs PUBLISH and full auditing?
> 
> krb5 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2040
> Needs 1 PUBLISH for rh9
> 
> imlib - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2051
> Needs more work for further bugs
> 
> ImageMagick - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2052
> Needs 2 PUBLISH
> 
> squid - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2053
> Needs 2 PUBLISH for rh9
> 
> samba - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2057
> Need maybe another PUBLISH for each release otherwise building
> 
> cdrecord - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2058
> Needs 2 PUBLISH for rh9
> 
> apache - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2068
> Needs 2 PUBLISH
> 
> cups - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2072
> Needs 2 PUBLISH
> 
> gtk2 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2073
> Needs 2 PUBLISH
> 
> openoffice - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2074
> Needs 2 PUBLISH
> 
> libxpm - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2075
> Needs packages/confirmation
> 
> General (non-package bugs)
> --------------------------
> 
> Notes
> -----
> 
> Needs PUBLISH means that there are packages available for QA that need
> to be QAd at the source level.
> 
> Needs VERIFY means that there are updates-testing packages that need
> testing. This is the easy bit, let's get this old ones out of the way
> ASAP.
> 
> * means that there is a judgement call that can be made on the bug
> system immediately. Please follow up onlist with opinions.
> 
> Changes
> -------
> 
> $Log: issues.txt,v $
> Revision 1.47  2004/09/20 00:01:49  dom
> update gtk
> 
> Revision 1.46  2004/09/19 18:16:32  dom
> update squirrelmail
> 
> Revision 1.45  2004/09/19 17:53:23  dom
> move xchat to fully-release pile
> 
> Revision 1.44  2004/09/19 17:24:04  dom
> update abiword
> 
> Revision 1.43  2004/09/19 16:54:24  dom
> remove more old bugs
> 
> Revision 1.42  2004/09/19 16:53:19  dom
> remove more old bugs
> 
> Revision 1.41  2004/09/19 11:35:49  dom
> update gdk-pixbuf, openoffice
> remove dead kernel bug
> 
> Revision 1.40  2004/09/18 00:31:26  dom
> update kernel
> 
> Revision 1.39  2004/09/17 23:47:10  dom
> update gdk-pixbuf, cups, remove cupsomatic
> 
> Revision 1.38  2004/09/17 01:17:47  dom
> update httpd
> 
> [...]
> 
> 
> !DSPAM:414e1fed162251483713606!
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> --
> fedora-legacy-list mailing list
> fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
> 
> !DSPAM:414e1fed162251483713606!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20040920/64026882/attachment.sig>

More information about the fedora-legacy-list mailing list