changes are still needed

[Pekka Savola]

OK, almost a week has passed since the last message on this thread.  I 
think we need to decide what to do.

Specific suggestions?

I've seen at least the following proposals:

  1) 1 VERIFY vote needed (for any version), after that packages are 
published after 2 weeks of timeout unless needswork/discuss or issues 
are identified.

  2) 2 VERIFY votes are needed (for any version), after that packages 
are published after 2 weeks of timeout unless needswork/discuss or 
issues are identified.
    a) timeout is counted from the first VERIFY
    b) timeout is counted from the second VERIFY

  3) 2 VERIFY votes are needed (for any version), after that packages 
are published after at most 4 weeks of timeout after the first verify, 
but two weeks after the second, unless needswork/discuss or issues are 
identified.

  4) 2 VERIFY votes are needed (for any version), after that packages
are published after 4 weeks of timeout unless needswork/discuss or
issues are identified.

1) or 2) are OK by me.  I could also live with 3) but I think it's 
overly complex. 4) does not seem like a sufficient change.

Let's have the opinions by Monday, and make the decision then?  We 
can't stall anymore.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings