proposed verify change
Eric Rostetter
rostetter at mail.utexas.edu
Wed Jun 15 14:28:36 UTC 2005
Quoting Johnny Strom <jonny.strom at netikka.fi>:
> Pekka Savola wrote:
> > In the interest of stopping the discussion and getting back to action, I
> > propose the following change (from Eric):
Yes, I've spent more time on this e-mail thread than I have doing QA, which
is sad. I'd like to see it end.
> > 1 verify vote (for any version) plus 4 weeks of no activity, or 2 verify
> > votes (for any version) and 2 weeks of no activity after the first
> > verify vote.
I'm of course in favor of it. We can re-evaluate it after a couple months
to see how it is working.
> > I also suggest that unless there is significant objection, this is
> > implemented already this week by adding something like
> > "timeout=20050618" in the status whiteboard for the packages.
I'm still foggy on the whiteboard thing. As far as I can tell, only people
with sufficient karma or the bug-owner can update the whiteboard status?
Is this correct? I know all my attempts to change a whiteboard have
failed so far.
--
Eric Rostetter
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list