how to get started with helping the project [...]

[Simon Weller]

oops, not sure how I sent that to the list ;-)

Must be one of those days.

- Si

On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 11:31 -0600, Simon Weller wrote:
> Access was being rotated correctly, but it didn't appear that the error
> log was.
> 
> Give it another go now.
> 
> - Si
> 
> On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 12:24 -0500, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 08:31 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 08:29 -0500, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> > > > As I said;  It is NOT anything close to simple, and even then it is
> > > > open
> > > > to too much discernment.  A *kernel* has been released recently..who
> > > > tested it in it's entirety?   Where is the list of fixes and the
> > > > checkmarks that indicate "x" was fixed by Bob and "x" was tested by
> > > > Sue?
> > > > 
> > > > -Jim P.
> > > 
> > > Wouldn't that be nice?  And wouldn't it be nice if we got a package out
> > > w/out the current sometimes 4 month waiting period?  You do know that
> > > Red Hat doesn't even have that complex of a QA system....
> > 
> > Redhat EL has achieved EAL2 and COE certifications.  I seriously doubt
> > they did this using the same Q&A procedures that FL is using.  Wrt to
> > COE and EAL, there is no such developer statements like "wouldn't that
> > be nice" or "warm and fuzzy feeling".  EAL and COE necessitate exacting
> > procedures and processes, something RH seems to be excelling at.  
> > 
> > Add ISO 9001 into the discussion and your above description of RH Q&A
> > either reveals fraud within RH (wrt ISO 9001 compliance) or insight into
> > your lack of knowledge of RH operations.
> > 
> > -Jim P.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > fedora-legacy-list mailing list
> > fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com
> > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
--