how to get started with helping the project [...]

[Marc Deslauriers]

On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 08:29 -0500, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> and I probably will continue at some level.  The problem is FL needs
> more than just the current people and process, and what it being tested
> needs more rigorous (think: ISO 9001) guidelines and procedures. 
> 

I think if more rigorous guidelines and procedures are what you're
looking for, clearly FL is not adequate for your needs and you should be
looking elsewhere.

> As I said;  It is NOT anything close to simple, and even then it is open
> to too much discernment.  A *kernel* has been released recently..who
> tested it in it's entirety?   Where is the list of fixes and the
> checkmarks that indicate "x" was fixed by Bob and "x" was tested by Sue?

Who tests the kernels that come out of kernel.org? Who tests Debian's
kernels? This is a community effort, if you want more extensive testing,
you'll have to do it yourself using your own set of guidelines and
procedures.

Marc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20050303/5f8018ac/attachment.sig>