how to get started with helping the project [...]

Marc Deslauriers marcdeslauriers at videotron.ca
Thu Mar 3 17:51:23 UTC 2005


On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 12:24 -0500, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> Redhat EL has achieved EAL2 and COE certifications.  I seriously doubt
> they did this using the same Q&A procedures that FL is using.  Wrt to
> COE and EAL, there is no such developer statements like "wouldn't that
> be nice" or "warm and fuzzy feeling".  EAL and COE necessitate exacting
> procedures and processes, something RH seems to be excelling at.  

That's why you should be buying Red Hat EL if you require the amount of
Q&A procedures you think they have in place.

> Add ISO 9001 into the discussion and your above description of RH Q&A
> either reveals fraud within RH (wrt ISO 9001 compliance) or insight into
> your lack of knowledge of RH operations.

Is RH actually ISO 9001?

Marc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20050303/730d5e5f/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-legacy-list mailing list