PHP Attacks....

[James Kosin]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
 
Michal Jaegermann wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:22:28AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 14:12 -0500, Josep L. Guallar-Esteve wrote:
>>
>>
>>> http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14088/info
>>> http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_136821.htm
>>> http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-5938475.html
>>>
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1882889,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03129TX1K0000616
>>>
>>>
http://news.com.com/New+worm+targets+Linuxsystems/2100-7349_3-5938475.html?part=rss&tag=5938475&subj=news
>>>
>>> http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/08/140203&tid=220&tid=106
>>>
>>
>> Does look like we need to patch this. RHEL issued an update,
>
>
> Do you mean that one from August?
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-748.html CAN ids between
> that one and http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14088/info do not
> agree although the latest worm descriptions would suggest that
> RHSA-2005:748-05 is the correct one.
>
> Michal
>
> -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

The CVE website states that CAN-2005-2498 is not the same as
CAN-2005-1921; so, I think to reason; both need to be fixed if we are
vulnerable.

James Kosin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
iD8DBQFDcmfnkNLDmnu1kSkRA39pAKCABlO6P3J7EVRAG6oefeclrPDEEwCeI2w0
U65qbkAwaJhCVlc+nNLt3ao=
=11iK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
Scanned by ClamAV - http://www.clamav.net