Upcoming transition of FC3

[Axel Thimm]

On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 07:21:51PM -0400, Jeff Sheltren wrote:
> On Oct 21, 2005, at 5:46 PM, Axel Thimm wrote:
> 
> >On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 11:53:45AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> >>I never did like all the extra repo files for each repository.  I  
> >>liked
> >>the idea of one file per family, so there was one file for say
> >>freshrpms, one for atrpms, one for extras, one for core/updates,  
> >>one for
> >>Legacy.  Each having sub-repos such as testing/devel/whatever.  But
> >>thats just my opinion.  Easier to edit one file than 4.  Fedora  
> >>steering
> >>folks tell me that I can go w/ what I prefer.  Thoughts?
> >>
> >
> >I agree. Modularity is nice, and when sometimes missed too much,
> >people then tend to have each configuration line in a separate file :)
> >
> >I'd even go as far as declare legacy as part of core/updates. In fact
> >that's how ATrpms distributes yum/smart/apt configuration
> >bits. core/updates/legacy (including disabled *-testing bits) are all
> >in a "base" config file.
> 
> I'm not sure I understand quite what you mean by the 2nd paragraph...

To have core/updates/legacy and their testing subrepos in one file and
have the testing bits disabled.

> Anyway, here's an updated package with two main changes:
> 1) all repos live in one file - fedora-legacy.repo
> 2) file is marked as config(noreplace) in the RPM
> 
> http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/~jeff/legacy/legacy-yumconf-3-2.fc3.src.rpm
> 
> Spec: http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/~jeff/legacy/legacy-yumconf-2.spec
> 
> -Jeff
> 

-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20051022/c5466e91/attachment.sig>