Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification: httpd and mod_ssl

[Jim Popovitch]

Pekka Savola wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>> I doubt this is a problem w/ Pekka's list as he has been very exacting 
>> up until now.  With this bug(s) I see the explanation above (separate 
>> bug report, etc), but I don't see any reference to 168420 and 166941 
>> in any of the issues lists.
> 
> (Yeah, I update the buglists typically once or twice a day..)
> 
> The problem here is that if you use (and I recall you do):
> 
> http://www.netcore.fi/pekkas/buglist-rhl73.html
> 
> , the package doesn't show there, because a VERIFY has already been 
> given for the package on that version (so it doesn't anymore have 
> 'publish-rhl73' tag which the code is looking after).
> 
> However, it is listed in:
> http://www.netcore.fi/pekkas/buglist.html

Yes it is, it is listed like this:

   "httpd 2.0 multiple vulnerabilities - CAN-2005-2700, CAN-2005-2728"

I know that my rh73 systems don't have httpd 2.0, so I would 
automatically ignore that.  I guess the problem is bigger than just not 
being able to locate the bugs, the problem is also correctly identifying 
the bugs.  Pekka I know that you don't produce the Summaries, so please 
don't think that I am singling you (or for that matter any one person) 
out for criticism.

166941 started out as a bug for many somethings, all of them totally 
unrelated to rh73.  Even the Summary suggests it has nothing to do with 
rh73.

-Jim P.