Thoughts about James' Updates on Legacy list

Mike McCarty mike.mccarty at sbcglobal.net
Thu Sep 29 19:34:07 UTC 2005


Josep L. Guallar-Esteve wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 September 2005 11:21, James Kosin wrote:
> 
>>I'm not knocking RedHat, Fedora or Fedora-Legacy this is a good
>>point.  But, some of us need more than just patches to get us by.
>>I know, If you really want the latest, why not update to FC4...  The
>>problem there is that this is a server.  I shouldn't have to strip the
>>system down and rebuild it every 6-months or so.  
> 
> 
> Exactly. This is why Fedora Core is not recomended for production server 
> usage. For home server, sure, works good like anty other distributution. But 
> for enterprise-grade server... no way.
> 
> 
>>I also don't have 
>>the money or budget to spend lots of money on RedHat ES.
> 
> 
> Then I strongly recommed you to try out CentOS. CentOS is the "free as in 
> beer" version of RHEL. CentOS is the result of recompiling the freely 
> available sourfes of RHEL.

So do I. See centos at centos.org via 
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

There's also an announce I subscribe to. I'm probably going to hop
from FC2 to CentOS one day.

Lots of really good folk over there.

[snip]

Mike
-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!




More information about the fedora-legacy-list mailing list