no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]

James Kosin jkosin at beta.intcomgrp.com
Tue Feb 14 19:30:03 UTC 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> It is referred from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legacy which has a
> link from the frontpage. How is that buried in clutter?. What can we do
> to improve that?\
> 
Don't get personal, I'm talking semantics here about not outlining them
as steps.

ex:  The first one is named 'QASubmit'... OK maybe a limitation of wiki
here and not someone's exact wording... but, maybe a description saying
Package Resubmitting Procedures could be better.  Something pointing to
the fact the page is a procedural form instead of a simple description.

Even something like follow these steps or procedures....

James Kosin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD8i+7kNLDmnu1kSkRAu6zAJ4874rS9Xfly2zdxapfWJecy7ObuQCffu8j
7Kz9ON76BJye21LktA4fJtk=
=qJij
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
Scanned by ClamAV - http://www.clamav.net




More information about the fedora-legacy-list mailing list