no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]

[Rahul Sundaram]

Mike McCarty wrote:

> David Rees wrote:
>
>> On 2/14/06, Mike McCarty <mike.mccarty at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean. Perhaps I misunderstood
>>> what the proposal is. My understanding is that there are new
>>
>
> [snip]
>
>> That is correct. However, if the necessary QA votes get published
>> before the timeout hits, the package will be released sooner.
>
>
> Then the Legacy Project has removed my ability not to subscribe
> to "testing".

Seems to be a misunderstanding here. There are separate repositories for 
testing and general legacy updates. Yes?

-- 
Rahul 

Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers