no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]

Mike McCarty mike.mccarty at sbcglobal.net
Tue Feb 14 21:14:07 UTC 2006


Eric Rostetter wrote:
[snip]

> Proposal one does nothing but shorten the time period for pushing an
> update-testing package that doesn't have enough QA postings.
> 
> Proposal two does nothing but make it possible to push packages through the
> entire system with NO QA AT ALL being done on them.

Thank you. I couldn't have put it better myself.

I probably will not be contributing further to this thread,
as I've already stated my position, and I've taken action
to protect my machine by removing Legacy from yum.conf

Mike
-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!




More information about the fedora-legacy-list mailing list