no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]

[Jesse Keating]

On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 15:35 -0600, Eric Rostetter wrote:
> 
> But it was not a misunderstanding, it was a real proposal made to the
> list. 

Then the misunderstanding was on my part, as I was not aware a real
proposal was made to this affect.  The proposal about shortening the
timeout I was aware of, and AFAIK someone jumped to a conclusion that we
were doing away with QA and started the tail chasing we've been doing
for the past day.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20060214/a9c8a063/attachment.sig>