Friday Flames - What to do with RHL7.3/9 and FC1/2

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On 6/9/06, seth vidal <skvidal at linux.duke.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 23:53 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > As we approach FC6 Test2, we should make a decision wrt RHL7.3/9 and
> > FC1/2.  We've been supporting these releases for a while now, and
> > they've grown pretty long in the tooth, even by Legacy standards.  Our
> > lifetime policy would dictate that FC1 should be gone already, and FC2
> > would go when we pick up FC4, so that we're only supporting FC3 and FC4.
> > The RHL releases are a different matter.
> >
>
> +1 for killing rhl 7.3, 9, fc1 and fc2 when fc4 comes in.
>

I think so too. If people need support for RHL-7.3/9 they need to pay
someone to support it or move to something else. The amount of time
trying to get a patched set done, tested, and finished is a full-time
job for people.


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
CSIRT/Linux System Administrator