Rebuild exisitng errata for x86_64?

[Rahul Sundaram]

Jesse Keating wrote:

>On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:26 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>  
>
>>Thats strange. How does RHL content affect the ability of Fedora Legacy 
>>to use Fedora Extras buildsystems?. I didnt see any public discussion 
>>happening on this and we definitely need the details spelled out more 
>>precisely.
>>    
>>
>
>Again, I'm not quite sure what it was.  I just don't remember.  I think
>it was discussed during a Fedora board meeting.  I could ask the board
>if they remembered or if minutes were taken.
>  
>
Ya. It would be good to see an yes or no along with the details so that 
we understand better where the bottle neck is if any.

>So as far as Legacy goes, we're using the Fedora wiki, we're considering
>collapsing all of our website into the Wiki, we're moving to use the
>same software as Extras, moving to get our repo data in Core directly,
>send announcements via fedora-announce, etc...  If our systems are in
>the same place as Extras systems, and Fedora Sysadmins have access to
>them as well, and we share of the publish space, is that not
>integration?  I don't think we need to shove other projects onto the
>same systems that do Extras builds.
>
The way I see it, Fedora Extras and Core already have access to PPC 
systems and Legacy is meanwhile waiting for hardware donations. If we 
share the infrastructure and we are well integrated, that shouldnt be 
happening. This is not about shoving anything but tapping into the 
resources available till we can separate it more in the future if thats 
desirable.

-- 
Rahul