New sendmail and missing /usr/lib/sendmail
Jesse Keating
jkeating at j2solutions.net
Mon Mar 27 15:51:05 UTC 2006
On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 22:16 -0600, Eric Rostetter wrote:
> All I know is that in bug 186277 it says:
>
> > Comment #13 From Jesse Keating on 2006-03-23 11:58 EST [reply]
> > I did have advance notice and I was on vendor-sec. However like
> > you said this
> > was a hard hole to exploit, and we were in the middle of upgrading our build
> > system. Had this been an easier hole to exploit, we would have had test
> > packages ready prior to the public announcement.
Thats my fault. I confused CVE issues. Some other things came through
vendor-sec, this one didn't. My bad.
--
Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20060327/02700e47/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list