New sendmail and missing /usr/lib/sendmail

Jesse Keating jkeating at j2solutions.net
Mon Mar 27 15:51:05 UTC 2006


On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 22:16 -0600, Eric Rostetter wrote:
> All I know is that in bug 186277 it says:
> 
> > Comment #13 From Jesse Keating on 2006-03-23 11:58 EST [reply]            
> >        I did have advance notice and I was on vendor-sec.  However like  
> > you said this
> > was a hard hole to exploit, and we were in the middle of upgrading our build
> > system.  Had this been an easier hole to exploit, we would have had test
> > packages ready prior to the public announcement. 

Thats my fault.  I confused CVE issues.  Some other things came through
vendor-sec, this one didn't.  My bad.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20060327/02700e47/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-legacy-list mailing list