Need SeaMonkey opinions - [Fwd: [RHSA-2006:0734-01] Critical: seamonkey security update]

[Christopher Aillon]

David Eisenstein wrote:
> Does anyone have any comments on how you wish the Legacy Project to approach
> this?  I favor SeaMonkey as a Mozilla replacement, as it covers all
> vulnerabilities in packages that dynamically link to the shared libraries.
> But perhaps there are other ideas.

I see no reason that it won't work for Fedora given that it works for 
RHEL.  I can probably offer some guidance as there were many hurdles 
that I had to overcome when building these packages for RHEL, though I 
probably don't remember them all off the top of my head.