doughnuts on a fish hook

[Steve Bergman]

No, you're right.  I shouldn't have said that.  I plead a bad hair day
and apologize. ;-)

Perhaps RHLP or a related project could pick up for a second year of
errata.  I suppose testing is harder than the actual
back-porting/patching.  As has been said, it really is going to take a
free (as in beer) desktop alternative with more than 12 months of
support to take on Windows on the corporate desktop most effectively.

-Steve



On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 19:43, William Hooper wrote:
> Steve Bergman said:
> > It obviously made sense to RedHat when RedHat was a company of ~100
> > employees.  But it does not make sense now that RedHat is a larger
> > company of over 600 employees.
> 
> A lot of things that made sense during the dot-com bubble don't make sense
> now...
> 
> Looks like this is turning into a flame war.  I'm not part of Red Hat's
> decision making process, so I can't help you with what motivates them to
> do what they do.  I was just giving an alternative view to "Red Hat needs
> to give us no cost software supported forever..."