libcom_err.so.3 question: ahem, a newbie question

Andy Green fedora at warmcat.com
Tue Nov 11 13:25:24 UTC 2003


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 11 November 2003 12:32, John Hodrien wrote:

> Once you've got an RPM database that only loosely reflects what you've
> actually got installed you'll get into this situation more and more.

Wow, I guess you never had to touch a .tar.gz, or a binary-only thing like 
flash or nVidia...  or pull something from CVS and cook it to get a broken 
thing working... Welcome To The Real World, Neo, where not everything you 
need is packaged.

> Or maybe people just enjoy living in a world of pain?

I'm happy when I can get on with my work with a minimum of detours into 
mysteries.  If a later RPM with a real .so.3 wants to crap on my symlink I'm 
happy.

- -Andy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/sONFjKeDCxMJCTIRAp3CAJ9dXMrrz1jq6uzbK4DWQte5f0lEtACeP/Eh
gvThlvNp5ZsmVQq3i2KVa88=
=L31f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





More information about the fedora-list mailing list