[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: severn3 base channel



On one of my machines I could afford to do a fresh install and
everything is great under severn test 2

However, one of my home machines has too many goodies and I wanted to
try the upgrade path anyway.  Well, I patched the endless search for
"/lib/libcom_err.so.3"  which up2date and evolution depend on.

When test 3 is ready I will try to upgrade again.


Thanks,
Ernest

On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 10:19, Gerry Tool wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 09:10, Terry Polzin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 14 October 2003 10:06, Gerry Tool wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 08:39, Terry Polzin wrote:
> > > > I would have thought that the base channel for rhn would have been
> > > > installed by the time the iso's were available.
> > >
> > > There is no base channel or registration required.  On a fresh install,
> > > up2date was configured to use the rawhide channel and has a number of
> > > updates available.
> > >
> > > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> > Wonderful, so I have to a fresh install?   What about my freshly upgraded 
> > maching from severn2?
> > 
> 
> I don't know the answer to that.  Usually, betaN - betaN+1 upgrades are
> not supported and are not a valid testing base.  Perhaps Bill Nottingham
> can comment.
> 
> Gerry Tool
> 
> 
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list redhat com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
-- 
Ernest L. Williams Jr. <ernesto ornl gov>




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]