[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: When doing an up2date, I get a warning about GPG not signed



I had this smae problem. It "went away" when I removed the key file
from /etc/sysconfig/rhn. Not the best solution, but it is keeping me
current now ...

Philip

On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 08:41:49AM -0400, Williams Jr, Ernest L. wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>  
> 
> I am not sure if this is the same as getting the GPG not signed.
> 
>  
> 
> The other problem does not let you connect to RHN at all.  I know about
> that one since I have RH 7.3/9.0 as well.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Maybe the Rawhide packages don't get GPG signed???   GPG is used to
> prevent tampering, right
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Ernesto
> 
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-list-admin redhat com [mailto:fedora-list-admin redhat com]
> On Behalf Of Liam Griffiths
> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 8:37 AM
> To: fedora-list redhat com
> Subject: Re: When doing an up2date, I get a warning about GPG not signed
> 
>  
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Williams Jr, Ernest L. wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
>  
> 
> I am doing an up2date after installing Fedora test 3:
> 
>  
> 
> Does anyone else get a warning about the packages not being signed with
> GPG??
> 
> This is potentially dangerous, right?  Should I not proceed with the
> up2dates.
> 
> Not sure if this applies to Fedora as it does to Red Hat, but from a
> link on their front page....
> 
> "The certificate used by up2date and rhn_register to communicate with
> Red Hat Network reached its end of life on August 28th, 2003. Users
> attempting to connect to Red Hat Network will see SSL connection or
> certificate verification failures."
> 
> Check out a fix at::
> 
> https://rhn.redhat.com/help/latest-up2date.pxt
> 
> Cheers,
> Liam
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ernest L. Williams Jr.
> 
> ORNL
> 
>  
> 




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]