[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: CNET News Article



Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote:


> I'd like to offer public accolades to Red Hat for being explicit with
> trademark and license issues, and cleanly delineating the parts that are
> not open source and freely redistributable.  Red Hat is not required to do this,
> and historically some other vendors (SCO/Caldera OpenLinux, and others)
> have made it a point to entwine the pieces so as to frustrate attempts to
> reuse their work.
> 
> Given the pressures and responsibilties on a publicly-traded company,
> this is all the more admirable.

Deja vu.

Already discussed on http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

more info:
http://www.redhat.com/licenses/rhel_us_3.html
http://www.linuxmafia.com/~rick/linux-info/rhas-isos
http://www.redhat.com/about/corporate/trademark/
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html

-- 
HTML mails are going to trash automatically




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]