man2html question

[Matt Morgan]

On 04/06/2004 06:11 PM, duncan brown wrote:

>ah, i'm looking for something more dynamic.  it looks like maintenance of man2html has been taken over by someone else in late 2003, but they havn't done anything, though it looks like they've got big plans for the 4.0 release.
>  
>
Dynamic, or automatic? I mean, are you writing man pages and updating 
them frequently, so you need a way to get an updated HTML version 
on-the-fly? Or do you just want a way to take existing man pages and 
convert them en-masse to HTML?

Not that I have an immediate, perfect solution either way, but you got 
me interested.

>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Matt Morgan <matt.morgan-fedora-list at brooklynmuseum.org>
>Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 14:43:43 -0400
>To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
>Subject: Re: man2html question
>
>  
>
>>On 04/06/2004 02:02 PM, duncan brown wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>http://www.oac.uci.edu/indiv/ehood/man2html.html
>>>
>>>so, man2html hasn't been updated since '97 (hard to believe that's 7 years ago), and the man.cgi that comes with it doesn't work out of the box, and the tweaks i did to fix paths didn't really do anything for me (bleh), does anyone know of a modern cgi frontend for man2html that'll work with a modern linux distribution?
>>>
>>>-d
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>In KDE, you can do
>>
>>#subject
>>
>>in the location bar in Konqueror, and then Save As html.
>>
>>
>>-- 
>>fedora-list mailing list
>>fedora-list at redhat.com
>>To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>Time will end all my troubles, but I don't always approve of Time's methods.
>
>+( duncan brown
>+( duncanbrown at email.com
>+( http://www.linuxadvocate.net
>
>
>  
>