No Pine, no tripwire.

[jludwig]

On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 11:04, Ben Steeves wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 12:55, info wrote:
> > I agree.
> > I don't like the fact that pine isn't included with FC1
> > However, I installed it no prob.
> > I don't care for mutt, so I installed pine.
> > I think pine should be included with FC
> 
> We've been on this merry-go-round before.  Pine's license is
> incompatible with Fedora's mandate.  
> 
> As you say, it's not hard to install if you want it.  Why needlessly
> encumber this already hefty distribution with even more duplicated
> packages?  I'm all for pulling some stuff *out* of Core instead.
> 
> -- 
> Ben Steeves                     _                    bcs at metacon.ca
>  The ASCII ribbon campaign     ( )               ben.steeves at unb.ca
>    against HTML e-mail          X                GPG ID: 0xB3EBF1D9
> http://www.metacon.ca/ascii    / \     Yahoo Messenger: ben_steeves
In my /usr/bin I have almost 3000 files most bins or scripts. I would be
lucky to guess what task 10% (300) of them perform. How many of us could
name 100 programs we use? 
-- 
jludwig <wralphie at comcast.net>