FC1 ghostscript update requires gdk-pixbuf and gtk+?

Andreas Mueller mailinglists at andreas-mueller.com
Wed Aug 18 15:16:47 UTC 2004


Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:20:03 +0200, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> > (@Michael)
> > There is a seperate package for gsx, called ghostscript-gtk, but
> > the only file in this package is gsx itself. I see no problem that
> > *this* package depends on gtk and gdk-pixbuf, but why ghostscript?
>
> Packaging bug?

It seems so. I have just checked this on another machine (FC2) without 
ghostscript-gtk installed, and there I have /usr/bin/gsx, too.

> $ rpm -qlvp ghostscript-7.07-29.i386.rpm | grep gsx
> -rwxr-xr-x    1 root    root            14468 Jun 25 18:44
> /usr/bin/gsx $ rpm -qlvp ghostscript-gtk-7.07-29.i386.rpm | grep gsx
> -rwxr-xr-x    1 root    root            14468 Jun 25 18:44
> /usr/bin/gsx

But why does this give no file conflict during the installation of 
ghostscript-gtk?

Andreas.





More information about the fedora-list mailing list